NEW DELHI: The wife of detained climate activist Sonam Wangchuk told SC on Wednesday that he was in no way connected with the violence that erupted in Ladakh on Sept 24 as he was only staging a non-violent and peaceful protest through a hunger strike and that there had been "grave and incurable procedural lapses" in his detention following the incident.
In a detailed petition filed in the court, Gitanjali Angmo pointed out various flaws in the action taken against her husband and submitted that four videos which were primarily relied upon by the detaining authority were provided to him after 23 days.
She told the court that the detention order was passed on the basis of "stale" FIRs, with three of the five FIRs being filed a year back. She said a fourth FIR was filed in Aug, but it was not connected with the incident, and the fifth FIR filed over the Sept-24 incident "does not contain any allegation of violence, provocation or instigation against Wangchuk". "In fact, the FIR clearly states that certain miscreants instigated people who joined the hunger strike," she said.
"It is submitted that the detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, as it relies upon stale, irrelevant, and extraneous FIRs. Out of the five FIRs relied upon, three pertain to the year 2024, bearing no proximate, live or rational nexus to his detention in Sept 2025. Moreover, four out of the five FIRs, of which three are registered against 'unknown persons', do not name him. There is thus no clear, live, proximate or intelligible connection between FIRs & his preventive detention under the NSA," the petition said.
The detention order is premised on the fear of public panic which may be caused if Wangchuk is not detained, with the respondents not furnishing any evidence linking the statements made by him to any incident of public unrest or media outrage.
In a detailed petition filed in the court, Gitanjali Angmo pointed out various flaws in the action taken against her husband and submitted that four videos which were primarily relied upon by the detaining authority were provided to him after 23 days.
She told the court that the detention order was passed on the basis of "stale" FIRs, with three of the five FIRs being filed a year back. She said a fourth FIR was filed in Aug, but it was not connected with the incident, and the fifth FIR filed over the Sept-24 incident "does not contain any allegation of violence, provocation or instigation against Wangchuk". "In fact, the FIR clearly states that certain miscreants instigated people who joined the hunger strike," she said.
"It is submitted that the detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, as it relies upon stale, irrelevant, and extraneous FIRs. Out of the five FIRs relied upon, three pertain to the year 2024, bearing no proximate, live or rational nexus to his detention in Sept 2025. Moreover, four out of the five FIRs, of which three are registered against 'unknown persons', do not name him. There is thus no clear, live, proximate or intelligible connection between FIRs & his preventive detention under the NSA," the petition said.
The detention order is premised on the fear of public panic which may be caused if Wangchuk is not detained, with the respondents not furnishing any evidence linking the statements made by him to any incident of public unrest or media outrage.
You may also like
TikTok star Kaelin Bradshaw dies at 29 after sharing her final goodbye from hospice in emotional last video
Arc Raiders fans can save cash on Deluxe Edition for PS5
"Why can't a son of Muslim become Bihar Deputy CM, other 17% minority community only for spreading carpet?": Asaduddin Owaisi
John Cena's RAW Comeback: Five Potential Opponents Awaiting Him
Ex-DSP shoots AAP neta in Punjab, 'on the run'
